<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Golden Lotus &#8211; M10 card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913</link>
	<description>All about - you guessed it - Magic:The Gathering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 03:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sane~</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Sane~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-507</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why not use bloodmoon or magus of the moon to counter 3lands sac??&quot;

That wouldnt work, because it comes into play, and bloodmoon checks after the come into play effect. In addition you wouldnt be able to use the cards ability untill bloodmoon left play. Fortunatelly you dont have to worry about it because it not an actual card. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why not use bloodmoon or magus of the moon to counter 3lands sac??&#8221;</p>
<p>That wouldnt work, because it comes into play, and bloodmoon checks after the come into play effect. In addition you wouldnt be able to use the cards ability untill bloodmoon left play. Fortunatelly you dont have to worry about it because it not an actual card. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-506</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve known that for a long time now. It was revealed to be fake around 3 weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve known that for a long time now. It was revealed to be fake around 3 weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-505</guid>
		<description>this is fake because the art is from sunpetal grove which is one of the new dual lands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is fake because the art is from sunpetal grove which is one of the new dual lands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Did you look at the front page? I know it&#039;s off the list, it is probably fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at the front page? I know it&#8217;s off the list, it is probably fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bonner</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-500</guid>
		<description>did ne one notice they took golden lotus off the spoiler list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did ne one notice they took golden lotus off the spoiler list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-498</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve said, this is a MSE mockup made by me, not a card image. I am used to comes into play, so that is how I wrote it in. (Copy/paste doesn&#039;t work properly with MSE, so I had to write in the effects.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said, this is a MSE mockup made by me, not a card image. I am used to comes into play, so that is how I wrote it in. (Copy/paste doesn&#8217;t work properly with MSE, so I had to write in the effects.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not with stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>not with stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-497</guid>
		<description>well since the changes to the game say &quot;battlefield&quot; and not &quot;play&quot; I&#039;m going out on a limb and saying this is fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well since the changes to the game say &#8220;battlefield&#8221; and not &#8220;play&#8221; I&#8217;m going out on a limb and saying this is fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-495</guid>
		<description>This card should be an instant that reads &quot;Sacrifice 4 lands: discard that uber mythic from your hand because everybody already knows you have a golden lotus and is holding a counter, o-ring, path or purge anyway.&quot;

Although I could see this being useful to play a few smaller spells (i.e.: 3 drop, 3 drop, pump...swing) , using it to drop a fatty is risky business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This card should be an instant that reads &#8220;Sacrifice 4 lands: discard that uber mythic from your hand because everybody already knows you have a golden lotus and is holding a counter, o-ring, path or purge anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although I could see this being useful to play a few smaller spells (i.e.: 3 drop, 3 drop, pump&#8230;swing) , using it to drop a fatty is risky business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Nice catch - I completely forgot that it was legendary. You can activate a Door to Nothingness instead, if you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch &#8211; I completely forgot that it was legendary. You can activate a Door to Nothingness instead, if you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nik</title>
		<link>http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913&#038;cpage=1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonguardian.com/mtgblog/?p=1913#comment-493</guid>
		<description>You may want to proofread there a little bit... Progenitus is legendary, so having 2 in play is kinda sub-stellar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to proofread there a little bit&#8230; Progenitus is legendary, so having 2 in play is kinda sub-stellar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
